Why I’m a Trekkie (and LOVE the new movie)

I’m waxing Trekkie:  SPOILERS ahead if you haven’t seen Star Trek: Into Darkness yet.

It is incredible to think about, but the original Star Trek series had already been off the air for 2 years by the time I was born – it had lasted only 3 years (of its 5 year mission). As a kid in the 70′s, I watched what must have been reruns of it… though in my kid mind it was a regular show.

StarTrekCast1

Then the first movie came out when I was 8 years old, and The Wrath of Khan when I was 11. We had to wait two entire years after that to find out what happened to Spock (Khaaaaaannn!!!!).

Khan (1)

I have heard and read all the naysayers about the new Trek film generation, but I just don’t buy any of it.  I don’t judge what makes a Trekkie a Trekkie, but one reason I am one is because I absolutely love EVERY incarnation of Trek.  Each one is true to the vision of the original Trek, and yet each one is unique and awesome.  

StarTrek2I think the reason I love these NEW Trek movies is because there is such a clear choice (and it was the case from the beginning) that this series is not meant to relive those original adventures or decisions – but rather, because the timeline got shifted, in this new universe we can explore the characters knowing that they are not repeating but rather re-encountering all the wonders of the first time around, but in a new, unique way.  So STID Castwe don’t have to compare them, just appreciate the homage.  By giving them this new timeline, nothing is taken from the original, but the same amazing characters can now be explored in new ways… which is why Into Darkness does such a great job of combining elements of the Khan legacy with the new timeline.

I actually think the actors chosen for the roles are fantastic for them.  Karl Urban seemed to be channeling Deforest Kelly, and Simon Pegg is irrationally perfect for Scotty.  But I also like Chris Pine’s version of Kirk: a rash, emotion-based being, but one who is clearly in the process of maturing.  For me, the uncanny ability Zach Quinto has to morph into Spock made this movie for me — especially because of the way the entire film built on the last film in terms of Spock’s willingness to also learn and grow.  I like the bolder role for Uhura, and I loved the alien diversity on the bridge.  All of this combined to make a great ride on the Enterprise for me, including the way the Khan story was reworked for this new timeline.  

SpockDeathScene

I never thought there could be  a way to top what I have always considered the most poignant, wonderful scene in all of Star Trek.  It was dreadful and terrible and beautiful all at once – and, of course we all memorized it.  Because who wouldn’t want Spock to tell you that YOU have been, and always shall be, his friend?

But, incredibly, Star Trek: Into Darkness did it.  And in an entirely new way that made the scene just as meaningful, but gave it new life.

SpockScene2

THIS scene is the evidence of what really makes this particular Trek crew (the characters, not the actors) from the original incarnation so unique amidst all the universes that I love: there is not one hero, but rather a complete and total dependency on a deep and abiding friendship between two very different men. There can never be victory without both of them. Star Wars, Marvel, any of those (and I love them all) – they do not have this incredibly righteous dynamic that makes the re-imagination of the best scene in the entirety of the Star Trek expanded universe so amazing (and, yes, I think even better than the first version).  It is the one scene that depicts the true genius of Gene Roddenberry: it is not technology, or weapons, or even ingenuity, but rather, an unlikely but supremely powerful friendship that will always save the universe.

THAT is why I’m a Trekkie.

….and yes, I’ve already seen it twice.

In Which a Civics/Sociology Teacher Asks Some Questions About A 20 Hour Mass Detention in a Major American City

Wow.  I binge-watched a really intense suspense thriller this week.  Oh, wait…

I’ve been thinking a LOT about the unprecedented situation in Boston on Thursday/Friday.  (as evidenced by some of my status posts yesterday) An historically unique event happened.  Not the capture of a terrorist/murder suspect.  Not a massive manhunt.  Not racist/sectarian accusations based on ignorance and sensationalism.  All those things have happened lots of times before.  But in American history, there has never been a complete and total lockdown of millions of people in a major metropolitan area for 20 hours in order to perform a police action…and one in which the citizens completely complied.  I pass no judgment on the situation at this point because it’s too early in the understanding of it or even the processing of it.

But I have a LOT of questions about the ramifications of this event with regard to A) sociology: the group behavior that was clearly observable within the situation and outside of it; and B) the political issues of it with regard to a society that rarely sees the surrender of rights in the pursuit of safety so vividly played out in front of them.

The following are questions/thoughts I’ve had so far.  I invite you to add your own questions and thoughts.  This is only the start of a discussion so there don’t have to be answers and no one needs to defend anything – this isn’t a debate, it’s a brainstorm.  Yes, I’m being a little teacher-y, so you have to suffer for the fact I don’t have a classroom of students right now to inflict this on, but on the other hand, it might be a way for you to work through what you yourself have experienced this last week.  Because even though you might not have been in Boston or Watertown, you experienced the terror of a viscous bombing attack and the resulting affects of that fear, anxiety, grief and anger.  Perhaps just thinking through some of these things will help you process it a little.  I’m focusing solely on the time period of 10pm EST Thursday through 3-4pm EST Friday, which is the period in which the lockdown occurred.

There are many reasons to execute a “stay in your homes” directive: natural disaster, chemical spill, crazy killer on the loose, etc.  But never have we seen this sort of thing, with a major American city brought to a complete and total silent standstill, with millions of people cooperating in their own indefinite sequestration.

I think it’s instructive to note the difference between this specific situation and the resultant debate after 9/11. There has been ongoing questions about the removal or limiting of 4th Amendment rights (among others) via the PATRIOT ACT.  That is a MUCH broader situation and in some ways, that makes it more difficult for people to grasp in any practical way with regard to their own behavior.  When it is a nebulous “that doesn’t affect me” situation, it is hard to get a lot of citizens riled up about it (much to the dismay of Civil Liberties defenders).  We have already shown a general willingness to give up some 4th Amendment rights at the airport, etc.  While the following questions are aimed specifically at the Boston/Watertown situation, I do wonder if the last 12 years has been a subtle conditioning of which we only now realize the the extent.

So I’ll start.  Here are my initial questions and thoughts about the lockdown period.  This is COMPLETELY about the detention issues – NOT about the bombers, the case, the mechanics of the search itself, or any other part of this (all other worthy conversation topics) – I’m just right now thinking through the singular situation witnessed and experienced by millions during the quarantine.

=====================

  • There has not been one reported instance of resistance or defiance of the lockdown order so far (perhaps some will emerge as we proceed into the aftermath).  There was also NO concern expressed by the millions of worldwide onlookers during the event.  Now there are some things being published about it.  But during that 20 hours, I saw no clear discussions on any social networking or major discussion sites, and none on any of the msm coverage that indicated any concern about the issues contained within this police action. Until it started getting dark again and people started wondering how long it would go on.  That is amazing to me.
  • Millions of people agreed to be interned in their own homes for almost 24 hours. What combination of powerful incentives caused this to be so successful?  Is fear that powerful?  Is need for safety that powerful?  Is respect for authority that powerful?  Are those three things the unbreakable combo of behavioral control?
  • Thousands of people agreed to waive their 4th Amendment rights without an argument.  Their homes were searched relentlessly by militarized police.  This alone raises some interesting questions:

4thAmendmenttextAmongst those thousands of homes, statistically it would be impossible if many of them did not contain criminal evidence of some kind — drugs, evidence of violence or abuse, neglect, sanitation concerns, very ill people, stolen goods, etc.

On the one side, what would have happened (or what did happen that we didn’t see) if the search was refused or resisted?

On the other hand, what kind of domestic situations that otherwise might not be legally tolerated were seen by police in the course of the searches that they either a) cannot do anything about, or b) will unconstitutionally follow up on because the perceive an ongoing threat to society or the people living in the home?

Was there ANY hesitation or concern by ANY of those subjected to the searches, or ANY attempt to resist the search on Constitutional grounds?

  • Considering the lack of resistance displayed by both the participants in the detention and the onlookers (us), can we draw any conclusions about the strength of the Social Contract that secures the 4th Amendment… or even the 3rd (which we NEVER reference or use, but which actually may be historically instructive in this unique case).
  • I realize that people from all political sides shout very regularly that Americans are sheep and don’t think for themselves.  But I think this situation calls on some deeper thinking here.  Put yourself in Watertown.  How would you have reacted to the order?
  • Thinking on that, what do we now know about how simple it would be for a republic to slip the bonds of liberty and AGREE to tyranny?  Is just the right combination of fear, need for safety and respect for authority all that is needed?
  • Was the 20 hours of non-resisted detention of a major metropolitan area ONLY because of “terrorism?”  Were we observing a direct and contained result of the true power of terrorism?
  • Was the 20 hours of non-resisted detention of a major metropolitan area ALSO because of fear of the militarized police action itself?
  • I don’t know if I am unique among my audience here, but I have actually been in the middle of a militarized police action that locked down the town I was in.  This was in Northern Ireland towards the end of the Troubles.  The same sort of closed-in feeling with helicopters, tanks/saracens, military barricades and borders, searches, and quarantine.  It is scary (beyond what I can describe adequately here) and it creates PTS by simply the nature of the situation.  Now we have a major metropolitan region of millions that have the same resultant PTS.  This is similar to the the PTS that exists in Baghdad and Syria, Palestine and Israel on a regular basis.  So what behavioral modifications will occur both in the Boston area, and the rest of the country because of it (I am talking about personal and group behavior, not government policy).
  • Most likely, one clear result of the situation this week will be continued acquiescence to authority in order to secure safety over liberty.  This may not necessarily be a bad thing, depending on a person’s perspective (I am not agreeing or disagreeing) — but just for starters, I’m guessing there will be little resistance to the “London-ification” of American towns and cities.  That is, the complete and total CCTV observation of every square inch of populated area.  What does this mean for our future behavior and understanding of the 4th Amendment?

CCTV_Systems

  • What legal decision had to be made to include National Guard in a policing action?  I realize that a governor is allowed to call up the NG for in-state safety/security issues.  So were they clearly kept on a “public safety” mandate so that there was no posse comitatus crossover?  How will we know? Does it matter to us?
  • How will the people subjected to the lockdown and searches change their everyday behavior in response to their understanding of those 20 hours?  Beyond PTS problems that will have to be treated, what, if any, changes have occurred or will occur in their thinking about their own personal liberty?  What about the thinking of the millions of observers who vicariously soaked in the fear and sequestration?
  • Will this type of action ever be possible again?  I’m going to assume Americans aren’t going to just pretend all of these issues don’t exist.  At least I hope there will be some discussion about these things — so will that make us just as willing the next time a city is terrorized by the possibility of continued violence and pain, to draw upon the successful conclusion of THIS detention and agree all over again to the same methods?  Or will it increase the possibility of resistance the next time and cause a disruption in the ability of authorities to insist on a suspension of normal behavior (resistance to authority)?
  • This was not undertaken in an aggressive anti-population method.  In other words, natural resistance that would occur when your ENEMY is trying to intern you (a la Wolverines!) was not present during this situation – this was done by trusted public safety organizations in the name of security.  Does that make it acceptable?
  • Boston is an incredibly multi-cultural city.  The population affected by this detention and cessation of normal activity included virtually every cultural background, immigrant group, since-the-colonies descendants, and all other mixes in between.  How did, if at all, those cultural backgrounds play into the social contract that was enacted during the detention?
  • Very clear and consistent studies show 30% of our population is authoritarian.  Meaning, there is rarely less than 30% and usually more in a large group of Americans that prefers to follow authority and do what they’re told.  So what factors contribute to increasing that to an almost 100% compliance?
  • How conditioned are we to jump to political conclusions based on a racist or anti-muslim framework (almost identical to anti-immigrant/communist framework of the 1920′s & 30′s), that we are willing to exchange our liberty and natural rights for what we perceive to be our safety?  It’s easy to judge from afar, but if we place ourselves in the midst of terror — how able are we to think independently about the nature of that terror?
  • As was made clear during the entire ordeal, the mainstream media cannot do the above (resist flying into the stereotyping, hate & fear mongering political sensationalism), so how independently are we processing information outside of what we are being told?
  • What will security forces learn from this episode that will play into future actions like this one?
  • Do we care?

In the end, the detention of the population didn’t actually work.  During the investigation phase, it was the two times that the police actually released the public to participate that significant advances were made.  Knowing now, as we do in hindsight, that the liberty of the people, with all its inherent dangers and risks, is actually more conducive to solving a situation like this than removing liberty in the name of security, will that affect our future acquiescence to the same sort of situation?

On the very first day my students took a government class with me, among other thinking questions, I asked them to choose between Security and Liberty — which instinctively was more valuable to them.  The conclusion of the course brought us to the understanding that there is a fine balance between the two in a republic, but that balance is reliant upon citizen awareness and participation.  In the end, how does this event affect that balance, if it does at all?

And that was Wednesday….

SO, to sum up today’s news…

  • Boston Bomber caught on video!
  • Boston Bomber arrested!
  • Ricin sent in letter to the President!
  • Margaret Thatcher’s funeral!
  • Wait! There is NO Boston Bomber yet!
  • But now that everyone’s at the Boston courthouse, Bomb Threat!
  • The Ricin guy is from Mississippi!
  • The murdered Texas District Attorney & and his wife were murdered by the wife of the justice of the peace!
  • The Senate is voting on reasonable gun regulation!
  • The Senate voted DOWN reasonable gun regulation
  • There is no news in Boston – the FBI says so!
  • President Obama is ANGRY in the Rose Garden, and Joe Biden might punch someone
  • The Ricin letter guy might be identified!
  • The President is REALLY RIGHTEOUSLY ANGRY, w/ Gabby Giffords and Newtown parents standing next to him. Uncle Joe may still punch someone.
  • The Ricin Guy is arrested!
  •  Aaaaaaaaand, Texas explodes.
Your Move, Thursday.

Engage

Meet my Betta, Alpha

My son went crazy over fish last week. He’s spent the last 8 days finding everything he can about fish and sharks (had a brief shark phase when he was around 4). He researched what the best fish would be to own as a new fish owner, and he learned everything he had to do before he even asked me if he could have one. We talked about it, and today he got his first fish.

A betta:

betta

Me: “what will you name him?”

Son: “I’m not sure yet, I’m going to watch him for a while before I decide. But his temporary name is Alpha.”

Me: “Alpha?”

Son: “Yeah. You know…. my Betta, Alpha.”

…It’s my 10yr old’s world. I only live in it.

cartoonbetta

The End of a Decade No One Wants to Talk About

I haven’t taken to commenting here on everything in the news like I used to with my blogging.  The main reason is that I just don’t have the time anymore (I used to sit in an office all day bored out of my mind – so blogging was crucial just for sanity’s sake).  The second reason is that I find myself not quite able to stand thinking too much about what’s in the news these days.  My capacity for righteous anger has dwindled quite a bit in the last couple of years.  I don’t think I’m more cynical – but perhaps more resigned.  This may not be a good thing, and I try to temper it by exposing myself as often as possible to people who inspire me.  But this week may also trigger a bit more for me because my son is 10 1/2 years old and the context of this week’s news simultaneously makes me think about his first decade of life.

This week has been especially bristling for two reasons: The Steubenville Verdict and Ten Years Since The Invasion.

The Lingering Stench of Rape Culture

On Steubenville, I have once again felt the weight of sadness and anger a how our deeply ingrained rape culture can excessively comment on the plight of the perpetrators and criticize the victim.  John Scalzi’s post on the issue covers it as clearly as I would want to – and much better than any actual news outlet has bothered.

Relevant:kidnapI want my son to grow up in a culture that teaches boys and men not to rape.  Not one that says “girls, you better behave or you might get raped!”

My son is 10 1/2 years old, and he has been exposed to feminist and progressive parents his whole life – but more and more, his learning environment is the world around him, not just us, inside his home.  …Primarily, the world around him ONLINE.  How I manage to guide him in his online life has become more of a priority than I ever dreamed ten years ago.  Where he gets his worldview will be largely influenced by his exposure to what he sees and learns online.  His generation will grow up straddling two worlds: the digital and the physical.  And they will have to make choice after choice how to code switch and translate one to the other and back again.  Our ability as GenX parents, whose exposure to an online life arrived after we were out of puberty, to judge the quality rather than quantity of time spent in both worlds will be particularly crucial to our kids.  They aren’t growing up in a clearly compartmentalized world, where they live in the physical world so many hours a day and then have limited access to the digital world.  They are constantly exposed simultaneously to both.  Their access to both will only get easier as they grow up.  Thus, the need to be able to make healthy choices about both.

And a huge part of those healthy choices need to be about how boys learn to to be human beings that don’t expect it’s their world and girls just live in it at their pleasure.  Girls have to learn a whole new set of skills to establish their own humanity and independence as well.  Steubenville has reminded me that this small town shit where football rules and you can live in satisfied bigotry and misogynistic superiority your entire life still exists. But I have the opportunity to raise my son to want no part of it.

The Anniversary.

Most days, ten years would seem like a long, LONG time ago.  But it doesn’t anymore.  I was 31 on the day we attacked and invaded Iraq. I was still a very new mom and the invasion affected that part of me profoundly.  This was what I posted on my blog that day:

Wednesday, March 19, 2003
      ( 6:44 PM )

Mama Solidarity
Please light a candle and say a prayer for all the Mamas in Baghdad and all the rest of Iraq tonight (and in these next days) who are trying to figure out how to protect their children. I can’t even imagine the kind of terrorized fear that Mamas and children (and the Daddies too) must be feeling right now, waiting for the invasion, knowing it’s coming. I feel so responsible and I feel so helpless. May you and your babies be safe and unharmed…and may grace and comfort be in your hearts. The rest of us Mamas are praying for you.

I entered that week in a daze that I’m sure thousands of other Americans felt: how did we let this happen?  We KNEW Bush was lying.  We KNEW this was wrong.  We were in the streets by tens of thousands… and before the invasion, MILLIONS around the world were in the streets.  Yet nothing seemed to be able to stop it.  So that feeling of helplessness, mixed with guilt, mixed with anger, mixed with fear for our own troops and the innocent, helpless people of Iraq, just warred within us and all around us while our own country started a horrible, horrible war.

IRAQ-US-WAR-MASSIVE RE-CROPIt’s sometimes hard to think back and remember how it all felt, and yet at the same time, it is still so near the surface.  Possibly because no one has ever been held accountable for this travesty of global injustice.  Not the architects of the invasion: Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rice.  Not the media giants who went along, not questioning.  Not the political actors who worked to silence the truth tellers like Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame. Not the military industrial complex that made billions of dollars in profit by harming our own soldiers.  Not the Wall Street bankers who began a years-long campaign to short-sell this country right into the crapper.  None of them.

My son spent the first eight years of his life attending anti-war protests.  He was still in the womb at his first one (we were among the few who also protested the invasion of Afghanistan.  I am curious as to why it is so popular to be for THAT invasion.  As if it is so much more justifiable to bomb and invade an entire country for the actions of an independent group sheltered by a bunch of tribal dictators.  If the 9/11 bombers had been from Portland, and some of the City Council had sheltered them or given them a way to get away secretly, would the government have been justified in blowing the hell out of all of us who live here?  According to our brand new foreign policy in 2002, evidently they would have).  He got to ride in the stroller the first years – he graduated to the Red Wagon after a while.  And eventually he walked along side me.  I feel grateful that he has grown up in a city where this kind of behavior is not only acceptable but expected of the general population.  He has grown up in a community with kids his age who have followed exactly the same anti-authoritarian path.

My son at his 4th anti-war protest.  He carried his own signs by this point.

My son at his 4th anti-war protest. He carried his own signs by this point.

There are a lot of children in the United States who are my son’s age – well a few months younger than my son.  He was born just ahead of the 9/11 Baby Boomlet (there was evidently a LOT of end-of-the-world-sex going on that horrible September).  That means there are tens of thousands of ten-year-olds in this country right now who are as old as the anniversary of this invasion.  The country in which they spent their childhood was one that has produced a generation of wounded veterans, both in body and spirit.  It’s a country which is the biggest aggressor in the world.  It is a country in which their parents are struggling economically more than their grandparents ever had to.  It’s a country in which their education will cost more than it ever has, where they are more likely to be hungry or in poverty than ever before, and where their government is more broken than ever before.

This ten year anniversary is not just a reminder of the devastation we  have wreaked upon Iraq.  It’s a reminder of the devastation we have wreaked upon ourselves.  And maybe that’s the real reason why nobody really wants to remember.

"An Owie to One is an Owie to All"- Mama's Little Activist -

“An Owie to One is an Owie to All”
- Mama’s Little Activist -

1984: Good Times in the Cold War

I saw two movies this week that took me back a bit to my Cold War Childhood.  We GenXers don’t talk a lot about growing up under the black cloud of Imminent Nuclear Destruction, but it shaped our formative years.  The government and media did everything they could to remind us that we were doomed – DOOMED – by using everything from Nuclear Bomb Drills in school (no shit, we had to get under our desks, similar to the Earthquake Drill except even in the 4th grade we didn’t bother since we were pretty sure if the bombs were coming, our desks weren’t going to help) to forcing us to watch THE DAY AFTER.  This was an interminable mini series on tv (well, it was 2 hrs long, but it seemed Dayafter1interminable) that was extremely controversial because, according to news commentators, it might not be super awesome to traumatize our youth with images of people with their skin peeling off after the Soviets dropped nukes across the Heartland – yet, everyone should watch it so they know what we’re in for!  We were actually warned not to watch it alone. But we should watch it.  To be prepared. Seriously.

qbert1820

The Machine of My Teenage Victory

To help us distract ourselves from our inevitable destruction at the hands of the Soviet Union, there were, thank Atari, video game arcades.  Which brings me to the first movie I watched this week that reminded me of my youth.  I thoroughly enjoyed Wreck It Ralph.  It was cute, sentimental, and lovely to watch the 8-bit memories float in front of me.  It had a redeeming end and a sweet plot.  But most of all, it had the greatest cameo ever: Q*bert!  This brought back so many fabulous memories.  Particularly, though, it was that one week in April 1984 when I gloriously held the position of High Scorer on the Q*bert in the Pearlridge Mall.  Yes, you heard me right: HIGH SCORE ON Q*BERT.    You might have thought that the year after Thriller was released would be a let down.  But no.  April. 1984. High Score on Q*bert.  It was a good month.  It was also a good month for another reason.  I turned 13 that month. I became… a teenager.

Which brings me to the second movie I saw this week that reminded me of those halcyon days of abject nuclear terror and group shame when one missed a step in the Thriller dance.  Red Dawn.  I didn’t go see this one when it came out in the theater because I was dubious.  How could the iconic triumphal film of my formative Cold War Youth ever be adequately remade?  But now that it’s out on cable, I was tempted by the little voice in my head that reminded me how much better the Total Recall remake was than the original (come ON, Colin Farrel vs. Schwarzenegger? Don’t cross me on this one.).  But Red Dawn?  How do you translate a film built completely on the premise that the Cold War becomes Hot (the very event of which we were at that moment in time deathly afraid) into one that is relevant in 2012?  I was willing to give it a try.  Because just watching the new one reminded me of that summer of 1984 when the original was released.

The best – absolute BEST – thing about the original Red Dawn was that it was the very first movie released with a PG-13 rating.  And when it came out in the summer of 1984, I was goddamned THIRTEEN YEARS OLD.

ClintYesNow that I’ve seen the new one, I find I’m not as offended as I thought I’d be.  I’m glad that it was different enough that the original masterpiece was truly preserved.  It had a good cast (I’ll get to that in a minute).  The only reason the invasion was more implausible this time around is that we really aren’t living in a time of tangible fear of invasion. The key to the original is that we actually believed it could happen.  We weren’t even living in a time of tangible fear of invasion 10 years ago when George W. Bush told us we were.  In our 2012 version, it isn’t nuclear war that paralyzes the United States but an EMP that knocks out both coasts prior to the invasion.  Probably the plot was best summed up in the first half hour of the film when Matty utters, “North Korea?  That doesn’t make any sense.”

The modern Wolverines

The modern Wolverines

Our modern day Red Dawn takes place in Spokane, WA (in my Pacific Northwest neck of the woods.)  Why the North Koreans would just parachute into populated Spokane neighborhoods seems odd, since I can pretty much guarantee that every household in Spokane has at least six hunting rifles at the ready, not to mention a very well equipped militia population sprinkled in the surrounding mileage of Spokane.  Anyhooooo, a main change in the character build-up is that Jed, the oldest brother, has military training in our modern version, which is helpful.  Also all the kids have the advantage of years of Call of Duty and Halo practice… which isn’t really an advantage after all, evidently.

The Original Wolverines

The Original Wolverines

I thought Chris Hemsworth made a good Jed in his new incarnation because it was different enough (no one could do a repeat of what I think was Patrick Swayze’s finest performance ever –and DON’T argue Roadhouse, that’s in a class of its own).  And I was impressed with Josh-from-Drake-and-Josh’s Matty (wow has he lost some pounds!). The original Matty was Charlie Sheen, whose portrayal was not as intense as his brother’s portrayal of Two-Bit the year before in The Outsiders (also with Patrick Swayze as the older brother – it was that kind of decade.  We all needed Patrick Swayze as our older brother just to get through).

hugh-jackman-wolverine

The ACTUAL Wolverine

My 1984 heartthrob, however, was C. Thomas Howell (omg, I had ALL the TeenBeat magazine that he was on the cover!), who played the tragic Robert.  In our modern version, Peeta Mellark plays Robert and is not so tragic this time around (possibly because he is distracted by the fact he will have to run straight from his fight with the North Koreans into another fucked up live action game with Katniss in a matter of months).  And while Peeta/Robert’s “Wolverines!” call in the iconic scene was okay, nothing could match the original Robert’s war cry in my mind.

WolverinesTWOIt was gratifying to see the Wolverines gain some multicultural dimension, and the girls, though not as badass as pre-nose-job-Jennifer-Grey, weren’t awful.  There were more explosions of course, and instead of an Air Force pilot, the Wolverines come across three Marines from the Free Zone.  I thought it was a little wimpy that they avoided the tragic way Robert originally dealt with Daryl … in this one Daryl is more self-sacrificial.  But then, we can’t tarnish The Peeta.

At one point, the Wolverines rob a Subway shop for food and it struck me as a little odd that people were still going to eat at a Subway during a North Korean occupation.  But it’s Spokane, so who can say. Of course, when they listen to “Radio Free America” the music is CCR – because, what other music are you going to play during a counterinsurgency?  In perhaps a nod to 1984, or perhaps just a nod to reality, the North Koreans aren’t actually very good at their jobs, so the Russian Special Forces have to come in to try to get the Wolverines.  It made me wonder if we just didn’t want to deal with the fallout of having to admit it’s actually going to be the Chinese who get us… not via the invasion route, but probably more the “uh dude, you owe me money” route.

In the end, I missed the symbolism of the Partisan Rock and the ode to the children who saved the world during World War III, but maybe we just needed that more obvious reassurance back then.

WolverineRock1984 – it didn’t turn out to be as horrible as George Orwell predicted…. though that whole Newspeak thing really worked well for Reagan.  It was a sacred year.  It was the year the Macintosh personal computer was first available to American consumers.  It was the year Michael Jackson’s hair spontaneously combusted during the filming of a Pepsi commercial.  It was the year Lionel Ritchie sang “All Night Long” at the Closing Ceremonies at the Los Angeles Summer Olympics (oh by the way, OJ Simpson carried the torch that year).  It was also the year of the Bhopal disaster, the famine in Ethiopia, and Bernie Goetz’s vigilante shootings. It was the year the CIA first introduced crack cocaine into the streets of Los Angeles (hmmm…coincidence that was where the Olympics were that year?) in what we would later learn was an alternate funding stream for their fun little venture with the Contras in Nicaragua at the behest of a guy named Oliver North.

But we didn’t know any of that yet.  We didn’t know the next year would bring something called Perestroika.  We didn’t know that within five years, the terror we lived with our entire childhood would be suddenly gone… so anti-climatically that we still regret we ever watched THE DAY AFTER.  And certainly it was a pretty major let down that the Cold War was not won with the drama and honor that we believed it would be after watching Red Dawn that glorious summer of 1984.

I don’t feel like we’ll have too much trouble with the North Koreans in the end either.

red-dawn-remake-set-photos-1

DC Comics: Superman Would Be Very Disappointed

Things are starting to unravel at DC Comics… well, maybe only just a little.1stSuperman

But the unsurprising consequences of Orson Scott Card’s ascension as writer for the new Adventures of Superman have now begun in earnest.  Today it was reported that Chris Sprouse, the illustrator who was assigned to Card’s first Superman story, has now withdrawn from the project.

According to USA Today, Sprouse said:

“The media surrounding this story reached the point where it took away from the actual work, and that’s something I wasn’t comfortable with…”

The problem is the controversy surrounding Card’s anti-gay stance.  Let’s be real, it’s not so much his “stance” as it is his very loud activist leadership against the equal rights of Gay Americans.  As I wrote last week, Card stands for everything Superman is against.  Sprouse didn’t make any specific comments regarding Card himself, but his refusal to work with him on Superman is a pretty large statement itself.

It’s harder and harder to justify DC Comics’ decision here.  Will it be more difficult for other devoted Superman illustrators to work with an author who represents the opposite of their hero’s values? Does DC really want to alienate thousands of fans and readers by continuing on this path?

The controversy will probably get DC lots of sales for Card’s first story, but at what cost to the legacy of Superman? 

The Super Symbol